mililocator.blogg.se

Texmacs therefore symbol
Texmacs therefore symbol











texmacs therefore symbol
  1. Texmacs therefore symbol pdf#
  2. Texmacs therefore symbol software#
  3. Texmacs therefore symbol professional#

You can check the quality of the HTML export by looking at TeXmacs website ( ) and at the blog ( ) or also at this other blog ( ) or at the webpage of Joris van der Hoeven, the main developer ( ). The exported HTML human-readable (although with some CSS here and there) like the LaTeX export (who say the contrary has visibly never used TeXmacs, at least recently). TeXmacs can export HTML with math in MathML (since 2005), MathJaX or images according to user preferences. Wikipedia pages) including proper recovery of mathematical formulas from MathJaX or MathML. I'm not sure I understand a use case for lossless reverse HTML import.

Texmacs therefore symbol professional#

I spend maybe months to work on a paper in TeXmacs and at most only 1h in LaTeX when I really need to because editors are become used to require from the authors the work a professional typesetter would have done in the past. if one day editors will decide to use XML as submission format, then what? I do not want to think about mathematics with a screen divided in two parts, and the quality of the process is also very important to me.

Texmacs therefore symbol pdf#

Using the submission requirements as an argument seems so wrong to me, it is like saying: since the final format is PDF we need to write our ideas directly in PDF. If you need to do algebraic manipulations, then it is more convenient to copy/paste on the screen that to rewrite the same equation several times with small variations on the paper. Most of my presentations are also written in TeXmacs and in these days I use it to teach via Zoom, or to discuss with colleagues/students, make computations, etc. If I need to collaborate on a file which is being written in LaTeX I write my parts in TeXmacs and then I paste them in the file. Three of my students wrote their PhD thesis with TeXmacs, and at least two/three other people I know.

texmacs therefore symbol

It takes usually from 1 to maybe 10 min to have the file ready, maybe small tweaks for some bugs which I report and then get corrected. Conversion to LaTeX format happens in the last stage of the submission (to arXiv or to a journal). TeXniscope, a previewer for DVI/PDF files in the early times of MacOS).

Texmacs therefore symbol software#

At least I do not want to use LaTeX anymore (note that I've been hardcore LaTeX users for long time and also developed software to support LaTeX, e.g. I think most of the discussion in this thread does not report any real current experience using it. Similarly all the lecture notes in this page:

texmacs therefore symbol

More in detail, all these papers are been written completely in TeXmacs and then converted to LaTeX to be put in arXiv: Most of my papers in the last 7 years, around 15 and all my lectures in the same period, circa 2 courses a year. I generally use TeXmacs for notes, derivations, lectures, articles, all, of course.













Texmacs therefore symbol